TI Brings OMAP 5 to MWC

by Anand Lal Shimpi on 2/29/2012 9:05:00 AM
Posted in smartphones , SoC , Tablets , TI , OMAP 5 , OMAP

A month ago we saw weeks old OMAP 5 silicon running at CES. Earlier this week we got a chance to see TI's OMAP 5 reference platform playing back 1080p video. As a refresher, OMAP 5 features two ARM Cortex A15 cores and is widely expected to offer a significant performance improvement over current A9 based designs. Cortex A15 is a much wider OoO superscalar architecture than the Cortex A9, drawing obvious comparisons to Qualcomm's Krait. We still don't know a lot about Krait's internals so I believe a direct comparison between the two is still premature. There's also the issue of availability. OMAP 5 is expected to ship in devices next year, although we may see some customer announcements/demos before the end of the year if all goes well.

TI also demonstrated a lot of augmented reality applications in its booth at MWC. We saw the standard miniatures in a room demo where you could interact on a tablet with virtual models layered on top of a physical stage. TI had one AR demo that allowed me to try on sunglasses after training it to my face. There's an advertising revolution in the works as soon as someone can figure out the right way to naturally deliver augmented reality to consumer devices. I'm not entirely convinced the smartphone will be the portal to the revolution but I can feel it building...

Gallery: Print This Article 9 Comments View All Comments Post a Comment Sharp Dressed Men! by ImSpartacus on Wednesday, February 29, 2012 Does everyone at MWC dress so well? ImSpartacus Reply Timing... by SydneyBlue120d on Wednesday, February 29, 2012 No availability in 2012 = no Google Phone for OMAP 5, sorry :(
Welcome Qualcomm S4 :P SydneyBlue120d Reply RE: Timing... by ImSpartacus on Wednesday, February 29, 2012 Oh God, you're right. I might actually get to upgrade my Droid X. My contract is ending in like April, but I'll definitely wait for a Google phone. ImSpartacus Reply RE: Timing... by Lucian Armasu on Thursday, March 01, 2012 It could still use the Exynos 5250. But considering the next Nexus will be made by HTC or LG, there's a pretty low chance for that to happen. Lucian Armasu Reply RE: Timing... by peevee on Thursday, March 01, 2012 The next Nexus, as well as all after it, will be made by Google itself, specifically its Motorola division. peevee Reply RE: Timing... by SydneyBlue120d on Thursday, March 01, 2012 You're both treating rumors as facts. AFAWN nothing is decided yet.
BUT
I suspect by this time they would have already choosen at least the SOC, and if it was Exynos 5250, I thought they would already choosen Samsung as manufacturer. We need to wait and see :) SydneyBlue120d Reply this is a year away from being in a product? by 8steve8 on Thursday, March 01, 2012 will Q S4 have any competition this year? 8steve8 Reply RE: this is a year away from being in a product? by Lucian Armasu on Thursday, March 01, 2012 Exynos 5250, dual core 2 Ghz Cortex A15 chip with Mali T604 graphics. Lucian Armasu Reply RE: this is a year away from being in a product? by SydneyBlue120d on Thursday, March 01, 2012 You will not see Exynos 5250 before Q4 2012 if not later ;-) SydneyBlue120d Reply Subject Comment Post Comment Please login or register to post a comment.
User Name Password Remember me? Login 1 View All Comments Post a Comment Follow AnandTech
Latest from AnandTech Pipeline Submit News! AT&T Sets Unlimited 3G Data cap to 3GB, 4G LTE Unlimited cap to 5GB TI Demos OMAP5 WiFi Display Mirroring on Development Platform Toshiba Announces Excite 10 LE, Shipping March 6th Windows 8 Consumer Preview: A Quick Look at Battery Life AMD Releases Video Driver for Windows 8 Consumer Preview OCZ Releases 180GB and 360GB Models of Agility 3 Microsoft Demonstrates Windows to Go Microsoft Demos Windows 8 on 82-inch Touchscreen Microsoft Shows Windows 8 CP on Tegra 3, Krait, OMAP 5 & Clover Trail The Windows 8 Copy Dialog Box Windows 8 Consumer Preview: The Four Corners Windows 8 Consumer Preview Available for Download DailyTech Audi Working on Wireless Charging for EVs Using WiTricity Technology NASA's ISS Control Codes Were Stolen, IT Department Incapable of Patching PCs House Republicans Question Obama's Advisers Roles in 54.5 MPG Fuel Standard Development Monsanto Defeats Small Farmers in Critical Bioethics Class Action Suit AMD's Acquires Cloud Server Maker SeaMicro for $334M USD Quick Note: AT&T Buckles Under Pressure, Raises Throttling Threshold for Unlimited Plans Verizon Complains That it Must Lock Android Devices in Order to "Manage" Them 3/1/2012 Daily Hardware Reviews HTC Admits to Sense UI "Bloat", Says Sense 4.0 is Less Complex Reed Hastings Sees Netflix Joining Forces with Cable Service Providers Intel Capital Creates a $100M "Connected Car" Fund Colorado Authorities Manage to Decrypt Laptop in Bank Fraud Case Giant "Tree Lobsters" Rediscovered on Rocky Volcanic Island Spire USMC, Navy Testing SUVs Powered by Fuel Cells As Google Moves Towards Massive User Monitoring, Governments Fight Back Envia Creates $125 Per Kilowatt-Hour EV Battery, Could Usher in More Affordable EVs 2/29/2012 Daily Hardware Reviews Twitter @CDemerjian yeah I keep my wit to a minimum, I'm aided by the fact that I'm quite sleepy. Snark and sleepiness are inversely proportional @foresmac interesting observation ;) "unlimited" was always full of caveats however @CDemerjian @ryanshrout I can't think of anything witty to add, will quietly board my flight instead :-P RT @anandtech: AT&T Sets Unlimited 3G Data cap to 3GB, 4G LTE Unlimited cap to 5GB http://t.co/lb4PtWXK RT @Qualcomm: .@anandshimpi @nguyen Andrew Ku @tomshardware & others sat down with @robchandhok and team to talk @Snapdragon http://t.co/nu0AIpYp @nerdtalker did an awesome job here: @anandtech Physical Impressions of the Nokia Lumia 610, 900, Nokia 808 PureView http://t.co/BpMuvhOw @WhatTheBit argh i keep making that typo, they are 32nm, fixed :) RT @anandtech The ASUS Transformer Pad Infinity: 1920 x 1200 Display, Krait Optional http://t.co/fbfRVzvB tip @Techmeme @AlvinPing it really is good, no? the phones feel great as well I am very impressed by HTC's new lineup: well built, good SoC selection http://t.co/4YCVDOTy  

Copyright © 1997-2012 AnandTech, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms, Conditions and Privacy Information.
Click Here for Advertising Information

OnLive brings Internet Explorer to iPad

Remote Windows 7 app adds premium serviceApplications News By Chris Smith Thursday at 02:01 UTC | Tell us what you think [ 0 comments ]

Tweet OnLive Desktop Plus brings Flash-enabled IE9 to the iPad

OnLive has added a subscription tier to its OnLive Deskop application for the Apple iPad, which now adds Internet Explorer 9 and access to the company's super-fast cloud internet service.

The OnLive Desktop app first launched in January offering remote access to a full version of Windows 7 (including the in-demand Microsoft Office) through the company's servers.

The new $5-a-month OnLive Desktop Plus service now brings Internet Explorer 9 functionality, which allows users to access the flash videos and websites that will not play on Apple's Safari browser.

However, there's more to this than just another Flash-enabled web browser.

Gigabit internet on your iPad

A subscription will give users priority access to OnLive's cloud-enhanced web speeds of up to a gigabit. Early tests have revealed download speeds of 650Mbps and upload speeds of 200Mbps.

It works by channeling your connection through OnLive's mightily impressive servers based in the cloud.

That means, regardless of how fast or slow, your home Wi-Fi connection is, OnLive Desktop Plus' cloud-accelerated connection will dramatically enhance page-loading and streaming speeds.

It'll also offer lightning-fast download speeds when opening webmail attachments from Gmail and Yahoo Mail, and transferring files from Dropbox.

Nothing short of breathtaking

"Experiencing a full Flash-enabled Web experience at gigabit speeds on iPad is nothing short of breathtaking, and OnLive Desktop Plus is your ticket to ride," said Steve Perlman, OnLive Founder and CEO.

"Combine that with OnLive Desktop's full-featured Microsoft Office and Adobe Reader PC applications and not only do you have the world's fastest mobile browser, but the world's most powerful productivity tools literally at your fingertips."

The company says a launch for UK users is coming soon, as well as versions for Windows, Mac and Android in the not-too-distant future.

Via: Engadget

Tags: OnLive, OnLive Desktop, iPad apps, AppleTweetreddit!Stumbleupon  Tell us what you thinkYou need to Log in or register to post comments

By submitting this form you agree to our Terms of Use and so are legally responsible for anything you submit. DO NOT submit anything which may violate the Terms of Use or another person's rights including copyrighted or offensive materials.

Submit Explore News ApplicationsOperating systems Related News Apple shutters iCloud push services in GermanyApple iTV rumours: what you need to knowApple buys Chomp to 'revamp' App Store searchNew Apple TV expected as stocks run outToday's deal: Official Apple earphones for £12 Hands on: OnLive Desktop review

Windows 7 on your iPad through the cloud

NEWESTMOST READMOST COMMENTED TECH NEWS HEADLINESOlympus OM-D impresses in AmsterdamWhy iTunes Match is a big step for content ownershipBest travel apps, games and podcasts for iPhone and iPadThis week's hottest reviews on TechRadarVirgin Media apologises in advance for Olympic issuesSamsung working on bezel-less Galaxy B smartphone?Sony a99 rumours: what you need to knowMore TECH NEWS HEADLINES20 best mobile phones in the world todayBest TV 2012: what TV should you buy this year?50 best free Android apps 2012Top 50 best free iPad apps 2012Top 50 best free iPhone apps 201212 best 3D TVs in the world todayTop laptops: 20 best laptops in the world TECH NEWS HEADLINESiPad 3 rumours: what you need to know (32)HTC One X: what you need to know (16)HTC Desire upgrade: what should you choose? (14)TechRadar kicks off its redesign Beta (12)Hands on: Panasonic Eluga review (12)Samsung Galaxy S3: what you need to know (12)Industry baffled as UK games sales slip 25% (9)

Find a review

Get more from TechRadar MWC 2012: What to expectiPad 3 rumours: what you need to knowSamsung Galaxy S3: what you need to knowPS VitaiPhone 5 rumours: what you need to know20 best mobile phones in the world todayiPhone 4SSamsung Galaxy NexusNokia Lumia 800Amazon Kindle FireSamsung Galaxy NoteNikon V1HTC RadarNikon J1HTC SensationSamsung Galaxy AceiPad 2 TechRadar Poll

Do you subscribe to a film streaming service?

YesNo, not enough contentNo, I love physical mediaNo, too expensiveWhat's film streaming?

Vote Results Where am I?Technology NewsTech newsApple newsMobile phone newsTablet newsTV newsCamera newsPC component newsPC newsLaptop newsInternet newsGadget newsGaming newsHome cinema newsHi-fi newsTechnology ReviewsDigital camera reviewsCamcorder reviewsMobile phone reviewsMP3 and iPod reviewsNetworking reviewsPC reviewsPC component reviewsLaptop reviewsTablet reviewsTV reviewsBlu-ray reviewsHi-fi reviewsTechRadarAbout usContact usSitemapReport this pageAccessibilityMedia enquiriesTerms and conditionsPrivacy policyAdvertising enquiriesJobsMore from TechRadarRegister & email newsletterFacebookTwitterYouTubeRSS feedsForumsPhone dealsSell your old mobileTechRadar Network3D RadarTap! magazineMacFormat magazinePC Format magazinePC Plus magazineLinux Format magazine

Copyright 2006 - 2011 Future Publishing Limited,
30 Monmouth Street, Bath, BA1 2BW, United Kingdom
England and Wales company registration number 2008885

Digital FutureBikeRadarT3MusicRadarGamesRadarPhotoRadar

Intel SSD 520 Review: Cherryville Brings Reliability to SandForce

by Anand Lal Shimpi on 2/6/2012 11:00:00 AM
Posted in Storage , SSDs , Intel , Intel SSD 520 , SandForce , SF-2000 Buy the Intel SC2CW240A3K5 HD SSD 520 240 GB 2
$553.38

Intel was rumored to be working on a SandForce based drive for several months now, but even the rumors couldn't encapsulate just how long Intel and SF has worked on this drive. According to Intel, the relationship began 1.5 years ago. Still lacking a 6Gbps controller of their own and wanting to remain competitive with the rest of the market, Intel approached SandForce about building a drive based on the (at the time) unreleased SF-2281 controller. Roughly six months later, initial testing and validation began on the drive. That's right, around the time that OCZ was previewing the first Vertex 3 Pro, Intel was just beginning its extensive validation process.

Codenamed Cherryville, Intel's SSD 520 would go through a full year of validation before Intel would sign off on the drive for release. In fact, it was some unresolved issues that cropped up during Intel's validation that pushed Cherryville back from the late 2011 release to today.

Intel's strenuous validation will eventually make SandForce's drives better for everyone, but for now the Cherryville firmware remains exclusive. Intel wouldn't go on record with details of its arrangement with SandForce, but from what I've managed to piece together the Intel Cherryville firmware is exclusive for a limited period of time. That exclusivity agreement likely expires sometime after the SF-2281 is replaced by a 3rd generation controller. There are some loopholes that allow SandForce to port bug fixes to general partner firmware but the specific terms aren't public information. The important takeaway is anything fixed in Intel's firmware isn't necessarily going to be fixed in other SF-2281 based drives in the near term. This is an important distinction because although Cherryville performs very similarly to other SF-2281 drives, it should be more reliable.

As Intel has been working on this firmware for quite a while, it's likely that the 520 uses an older branch of the SF-2281 firmware that has been updated over the past twelve months.

The BSOD is Back, but Not on Intel

Back in October SandForce announced that it had discovered a firmware issue that resulted in unexpected BSODs on SF-2281 drives on certain platforms. Why it took SandForce several months to discover the bug that its customers had been reporting for a while is a separate issue entirely. SandForce quickly pushed out the firmware to OCZ and other partners. Our own internal testing revealed that the updated firmware seemed to have cured the infamous BSOD.

Just as background, our SSD testing is rarely over once the review goes live. Any drive we recommend gets tossed into a primary use machine somewhere within the company. We keep track of drive behavior, including any bugs or performance issues over time. This long term testing process takes place over months. The results of these long term tests are folded into future reviews and recommendations.

The BSOD is caused by a bug in SandForce's power state logic that ultimately results in the drive disconnecting from the system while it's running. It turns out that Windows isn't a fan of you hot un-plugging the drive it's running on, which results in the BSOD. We had two systems that exhibited the BSOD, both of which were fixed by the update last October.

As luck would have it, our own Brian Klug happened to come across an unexpected crash with his 240GB non-Intel SF-2281 based SSD two weeks ago when he migrated it to another machine. The crash was an F4 BSOD, similar in nature to the infamous BSOD issue from last year. While two of the systems we reproduced the BSOD bug on were cured by last year's firmware update, Brian's system (an X58/Core i7 build) was BSODing regularly playing Battlefield 3. Games end up being a great way to trigger the SF-2281 BSOD issue as they frequently switch between periods of idle and load, which does a good job of stressing the power state logic in SandForce's firmware. I immediately sent Brian an Intel SSD 520 to see if the BSOD remained on Intel's drive. Switching to Cherryville caused Brian's BSODs to go away. Indeed most end user reports of SF-2281 BSODs went away with the fixed firmware, but we've still heard of isolated issues that remain unresolved. Whatever Intel has done with the 520's firmware seems to have fixed problems that still remain in the general SF-2281 firmware.

This is actually a dangerous precedent as it means one of two things. The first possibility is that SandForce has been made aware of flaws in its current firmware and chooses against (or is legally prevented from) disclosing it to its partners. The second possibility, and arguably even worse for SandForce, is that Intel was able to identify and fix a bug in the SF-2281 firmware without SandForce knowing it existed or was addressed. I suspect it's the former but as no one is willing to go on the record about the Intel/SandForce agreement I can't be certain.

Intel did go on record saying that the 520 is expected to have far fewer F4/F7 BSODs than any other SF-2281 drive. I asked Intel if I should read into the phrase "far fewer", but the answer was no - the 520 is expected to have similar reliability to the Intel SSD 510 and 320.

At the end of the day that's what Intel really brings to the table with the 520. As you'll soon see, performance isn't very different compared to other SF-2281 based drives. Intel's biggest advantage comes from the unique firmware that ships with the drive. Intel is also quick to point out that while other SF-2281 manufacturers can purchase the same Intel 25nm MLC NAND used on the 520, only Intel's drives get the absolute highest quality bins and only Intel knows how best to manage/interact with the NAND on a firmware level. While it's nearly impossible to prove most of this, the fact that we're still able to reproduce a BSOD on the latest publicly available SF-2281 firmware but not on the SF-2281 based Intel SSD 520 does say a lot about what you're paying for with this drive.

And you are paying a premium for the 520 compared to other SF-2281 based SSDs on the market today:

Intel SSD 520 Price Comparison 60GB120GB180GB240GB480GBIntel SSD 520 (SF-2281)$149$229$369$509$999Kingston HyperX (SF-2281)N/A$205N/A$420N/AOCZ Vertex 3 (SF-2281)$95$190$240$375$850Samsung SSD 830$110$220N/A$360$800

Last year Intel hinted at a move from the consumer market to enterprise server and client markets. The 520's higher price likely won't matter there, but for consumers the higher price is noticeable - particularly with good options from companies like Samsung now available on the market.

The Intel SSD 520 Introduction The Intel SSD 520 Random & Sequential Read/Write Speed AS-SSD Incompressible Sequential Performance AnandTech Storage Bench 2011 AnandTech Storage Bench 2011 - Light Workload Performance Over Time & TRIM Power Consumption Final Words Print This Article 85 Comments View All Comments Post a Comment ACK by Iketh on Monday, February 06, 2012 That price premium is doing me in, plus the irrecoverable drive thrashing. The 240gb Samsung will be my next purchase. Iketh Reply RE: ACK by Galcobar on Monday, February 06, 2012 Find yourself having to ship a less reliable drive back to the manufacturer and the price premium disappears. At that point, not having to deal with the downtime and inconvenience of reinstallation is all gravy. Galcobar Reply RE: ACK by Shadowmaster625 on Monday, February 06, 2012 These drives are all built to pretty much the same physical quality standards. Firmware might be a different story, but for firmware it usually doesnt require a trip to the factory. Do you have any evidence to suggest that the physical build quality of an OCZ Vertex 2 is less than an Intel X-25? Shadowmaster625 Reply RE: ACK by hackztor on Monday, February 06, 2012 I had a vertex 1 that I had to ship back 4 times, finally I asked for a newer model. Got back the vertex 2. That right there is what Galcobar was talking about. Each time shipping is usually 10 bucks and about 2 weeks turn around time. Sometimes higher premium for better tested parts is worth the extra cost. hackztor Reply RE: ACK by pc_void on Monday, February 06, 2012 The key word is sometimes.

And sometimes you pay a higher price and have the same thing happen.

However, you can make an educated guess based upon lots of research. It still doesn't mean it won't happen. pc_void Reply RE: ACK by Flunk on Monday, February 06, 2012 I don't think firmware alone is responsible for the much lower failure rates of Intel SSDs over say... OCZ.

I'm not saying other brands are bad, my Vertex 2 is still going strong with no issues, but these SSDs are built a little bit better than OCZ's drives and most of the other competition. Flunk Reply RE: ACK by coder543 on Tuesday, February 07, 2012 It's widely known that non-Intel SSDs have reliability issues. Recently they've gotten much better, but they still aren't yet comparable. coder543 Reply RE: ACK by nsanity on Tuesday, February 07, 2012 Having to ship a drive back means *absolutely nothing*. Hell, having to buy a complete new drive means nothing. The lost productivity when a business who has used a pair of SSD's as a shortcut to IOPS, as the machine BSOD's or drops an array till the system is physically powered off and on again simply dwarfs those costs.

I'm a SMB Integrator and having to clean up after the mess of others who have used SF-2281 drives (Corsair Force 3 in particular) to achieve superior IOPS as opposed to using tried and true SAS arrays.

Random BSOD's and array's falling off a system is the plague i've seen with the SF-2281's. Firmware updates have really done nothing to help on the Corsair Drives.

On the Corsair Force 3 release, to enthusiast/gamer customers, I sold 3 drives, only to RA them 5 times within a month.

From that point I essentially told all my enthusiast customers that I would not sell them a Sandforce-based Drive, because I simply do not like unhappy customers, and nothing is more unhappy than someone bringing me a drive back within 48 hours.

I realise my sample size is small (Probably about 20-30 SSD's total), but I can tell you that out of the 15 Intel Drives I've seen/touched/supported (X-25M G2's, 320's and 510's), none of them have had any faults what so ever. Every, single, SF-2281 drive has had faults.

The advent of Intel making Sandforce based drives leaves me with very uneasy. Intel's reliability is second to none, but I need more than just an anecdotal review telling me that they've "fixed" the SF-2281. I've been burned on a small scale, and i've watched a fellow SMB integrator friend lose thousands of dollars in free labour trying to repair systems based on these drives.

I'm looking forward to Anand's part two, using these drives in an Enterprise scenario - and hopefully he's got a machine doing heavy load testing in the mean time to better report on the reliability- or otherwise of these drives. nsanity Reply RE: ACK by ckryan on Tuesday, February 07, 2012 The Samsung 830 is maybe the finest consumer drive released in all of 2011. There is no shame in going Samsung, and in my mind, it's a fine alternative to almost every drive out there.

Samsung and Micron probably have to wonder how Intel gets all the press about their NAND being better. As far as I can tell, Samsung's 27nm Toggle in the 830 is pretty damn good. The Micron NAND used in Micron's own drives is fantastic, and of course Intel's top shelf NAND is good too. But only Intel gets the press for having excellent NAND in it's own drives.

I don't think enough emphasis is placed on the NAND. You can't get a clear picture of NAND quality through benchmarking. ckryan Reply Sandforce brings performance to Intel by krumme on Monday, February 06, 2012 Exit Intel from the controller market. No wrapping in reliability, as rightfully as it is, can change that fact seen from here.
Anyway, Intel can earn on the memory, as was probably the plan from day 1. We will see how profitability is here in 5 years time. krumme Reply Subject Comment Post Comment Please login or register to post a comment.
User Name Password Remember me? Login 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next » View All Comments Post a Comment Follow AnandTech
Latest from AnandTech Pipeline Submit News! Intel Updates Sandy Bridge Graphics Drivers Google Releases Chrome For Android Nokia Announces White Lumia 800 Droid 4 Available February 10th for $199 AMD Announces Turks Based FirePro V3900 LG's G6 Series: A New Kind of Google TV Partnership Clevo Refreshes X7200 With X79-Based P270WM, AVADirect First in Line Lenovo ThinkPad Tablet Gets Ice Cream Sandwich in May CDMA/LTE Galaxy Nexus 4.0.4 Update Changes Signal Reporting Micron CEO Steve Appleton Dies in a Plane Crash AMD: The Flexibility is in the Fabric Motorola Droid RAZR, RAZR MAXX Update Enables CDRX for Better LTE Battery Life DailyTech Ex-Acer CEO Slapped With Lawsuit for Joining Lenovo Quick Note: PlayBook 2.0 Calendar, "Bridge" Smartphone Control Demoed Quick Note: Google Launches Chrome Browser for ICS Smartphones, Tablets Bush Defends Auto Bailout Amid Romney Attacks Woman Ordered to Decrypt Laptop in Bank Fraud May Have "Forgotten" Password 2/7/2012 Daily Hardware Reviews China Prepares to Fine Apple, Possibly Ban iPad for Trademark Abuse Fisker Loses Access to DOE Loan, Lays Off Delaware Factory Employees Nikon Announces 36.3MP D800, D800E D-SLRs GM Makes eAssist Hybrid Standard on Buick 2013 Regal, Still Lags Behind Competition HTC Prepares Quad-Core Edge, Razor-Thin "Ville" to Fight Sinking Revenue Anonymous Spies on Secret FBI Conference Call, Posts Audio Clip Woman Receives World's First Complete 3D Printed Lower Jaw Implant 2/6/2012 Daily Hardware Reviews -- Intel 520 240GB SSD Edition AMD Concedes Die-Shrink Race to Intel, Considers ARM Cores Google Hires Former Senior Apple Director for "Secret" Project Corning, Samsung Mobile Display Announce OLED Glass Partnership Twitter RT @anandtech: http://t.co/GaRoGhhE RT @nerdtalker: I strongly believe we need a barebones search engine alternative that cares about objective result quality and not pushing it's own services RT @anandtech: Understanding AMD's Roadmap & New Direction http://t.co/eySXYtz3 @anexanhume already did :) http://t.co/MNY0RArM RT @anandtech: AMD's 2012 - 2013 Server Roadmap: Abu Dhabi, Seoul & Delhi CPUs http://t.co/ohG0B8BE RT @anandtech: AMD's 2012 - 2013 Client CPU/GPU/APU Roadmap Revealed http://t.co/zqYWKdRS  

Copyright © 1997-2012 AnandTech, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms, Conditions and Privacy Information.
Click Here for Advertising Information