Tuesday 6 March 2012

LaCie 2big Thunderbolt Series Now Available

by Kristian Vättö on 2/15/2012 3:00:00 PM
Posted in Storage , Thunderbolt , LaCie , 2big , Mac

LaCie showcased their 2big Thunderbolt drive at CES 2012 and it has now started shipping. 

Specifications of LaCie 2big Thunderbolt SeriesCapacities4TB and 6TB (and 8TB)Revolutions per minute (rpm)7200rpmMaximum Read Speed327MB/sMaximum Write Speed320MB/sConnectivity2x ThunderboltDimensions (WxHxD)3.5" x 6.7" x 7.8" (9.1 x 17.2 x 20.0 cm)Price$649 (4TB) and $799 (6TB)

The LaCie 2big Thunderbolt Series is essentially the LaCie Little Big Disk in 3.5" form factor. It has two swappable 3.5" drives whereas the Little Big Disk has two 2.5" drives. 3.5" drives offer larger capacities and better performance, particularly with hard drive. The 2big is rated at transfer speeds up to 327MB/s while the Little Big Disk tops out at 190MB/s (both results are for the non-SSD versions). LaCie has an 8TB model on their site as well but there is no price listed, which suggests that it's not shipping yet.

There are also two Thunderbolt ports for daisy-chaining, so you can daisy-chain several 2bigs or other Thunderbolt devices. The 2big most likely uses the same SATA controller as the Little Big Disk, which means you are limited to two SATA 3Gb/s ports. For the standard configuration this isn't an issue, but people who are interested in swapping the hard drives for SSDs should be aware that the SATA controller will be a potential bottleneck with the fastest SATA 6Gb/s SSDs.

Source: LaCie

Print This Article 20 Comments View All Comments Post a Comment Testing & Comparing? by solipsism on Wednesday, February 15, 2012 Will you be doing any testing of these devices and comparing them to other external drives so we can see if the speed gained from TB over USB3.0 of eSATA is worth any difference in price? solipsism Reply RE: Testing & Comparing? by zorxd on Wednesday, February 15, 2012 There is no speed gain over eSATA since these drives all are SATA internally, so there is no way that these drives can be faster than a native SATA 300 port.

And there is probably no speed gain over USB3 either since the largest number out there (327MB/s) is only about half of USB3's speed. The performance of controllers, however, could go on either side.

In the end, this is the maximum burst read speed. Average sustained speed is probably more like 150MB/s or so. zorxd Reply RE: Testing & Comparing? by MySchizoBuddy on Wednesday, February 15, 2012 where did eSATA come in? MySchizoBuddy Reply RE: Testing & Comparing? by Kristian Vättö on Wednesday, February 15, 2012 Remember that 2big has two 3.5" hard drives in RAID 0 (or RAID 1 or JBOD if you want), thus sustained 327MB/s sounds reasonable. eSATA 6Gb/s would be sufficient for that but eSATA 3Gb/s would bottleneck it a bit. Kristian Vättö Reply RE: Testing & Comparing? by zorxd on Wednesday, February 15, 2012 Except that you don't plug 2 SATA hard drives on a single port.
You use two ports, so SATA 300 is more than enough. zorxd Reply RE: Testing & Comparing? by repoman27 on Wednesday, February 15, 2012 Most external enclosures, regardless of the number of drives they can hold, only offer a single eSATA port for connection to the host. So yes, it is quite common to connect 2 or more SATA drives within an external enclosure to a host using a single eSATA cable.

The test that would provide the data the original poster was hoping for could be done by pitting the LaCie 2big Thunderbolt series up against the 2big USB 3.0 and 2big Quadra using eSATA. The 2big Quadra would no doubt be the slowest of the pack seeing as it only offers an eSATA 3 Gbit/s connection. I actually just did a quick search for a 2-bay eSATA 6 Gbit/s enclosure, and surprisingly was unable to find a single one. repoman27 Reply RE: Testing & Comparing? by Zak on Thursday, February 16, 2012 What if I want to plug 4 or more drives in RAID and I don't want four or more separate enclosures and max possible speed? Zak Reply RE: Testing & Comparing? by zorxd on Thursday, February 16, 2012 According to http://www.anandtech.com/show/5042/seagates-new-ba...

The fastest 7200rpm SATA hard drives do not even get 150MB/s when doing sequential readings. That's why I don't really believe the 327MB/s numbers, unless they count cache reading speed.

In the real life I don't think anyone would notice the SATA 3Gb/s bottleneck, especially since a lot of stuff is actually random access instead of sequential.
And we all know Lacie will ask twice as much for this Thunderbolt solution, so it's not going to be worth it. zorxd Reply RE: Testing & Comparing? by Kristian Vättö on Thursday, February 16, 2012 See this: http://www.storagereview.com/hitachi_deskstar_7k30...

Under the "fastest performance", the drive achieves up to 163MB/s. Of course the numbers LaCie claims are the absolute maximums but judging by that review, they are somewhat reasonable. I think ~300MB/s in real world sounds plausible, Kristian Vättö Reply RE: Testing & Comparing? by repoman27 on Wednesday, February 15, 2012 While 327 MB/s would probably be achievable over USB 3.0 using the same pair of HDD's, the highest number I've ever seen posted in an AnandTech article for single controller sequential USB 3.0 throughput is 326 MB/s (http://www.anandtech.com/show/4688/highpoints-rock... The highest throughput claim that Renesas (NEC) has made for their latest USB 3.0 controller and UAS driver is only 370 MB/s. Even the USB-IF indicates that the upper limit for real world USB 3.0 throughput is right around 400 MB/s. 654 (twice 327) is a significantly larger number than 400 (the maximum speed of USB 3.0).

This particular device is limited by the HDD's used. The Thunderbolt controller is good for 1000 MB/s, and (if it is indeed using the same chip as the Thunderbolt LBD) the SATA controller is a Marvell 88SE9182, 2-port, 6 Gbit/s controller capable of 490 MB/s sequential reads on a single port (http://www.legionhardware.com/articles_pages/gigab... Unfortunately, the other limiting factor is the lack of Mac OS X driver support for the 88SE9182, which only allows 3 Gbit/s link speeds to be negotiated for the attached drives.

Thus as Kristian pointed out, the result is similar to connecting two drives in RAID 0 via a single eSATA 6 Gbit/s port. repoman27 Reply Subject Comment Post Comment Please login or register to post a comment.
User Name Password Remember me? Login 1 2 Next » View All Comments Post a Comment Follow AnandTech
Latest from AnandTech Pipeline Submit News! Windows Store App Submission Process Detailed Virtualized or Not? We've Got Numbers Microsoft Discusses Windows 8 Accessibility Improvements Intel Releases Core i7-3820 AMD's Eric Demers is Leaving the Company Samsung Refreshes Galaxy Tab Again: Dual-Core, No Plus VLC 2.0 Announced: New UI and Blu-ray Support for OS X TI Announces WiLink 8 Family - WiFi, GNSS, NFC, BT, and FM Combo Chip HTC Announces Initial Ice Cream Sandwich Rollout Plans Rambus And NVIDIA Bury The Hatchet, Sign 5 Year Agreement Windows 8 Consumer Preview Event Scheduled For Feb 29 DailyTech Study: BitTorrent Piracy Doesn't Significantly Hurt Box Office Revenue Obama Thinks $7,500 EV Tax Credit Isn't Enough, Proposes Increase to $10,000 AT&T Dodges Throttling Concerns, Says Data Usage Up 20,000% in 5 Years 2/15/2012 Daily Hardware Reviews -- AMD Radeon HD 7770 and 7750 Edition SanDisk Outs 120GB, 240GB "Extreme" SSDs LightSquared's GPS-Crippling 4G Bid is Sunk by the FCC Apple Sues Kodak in Manhattan District Court, Takes Advantage of Film Giant's Poor Position Tesla's Model X Receives $40 Million in Advanced Sales Just One Day After Unveiling DoD Says International F-35 Lightning II Sales Crucial; Italy Cuts Orders by 41 LG X3 Packs 1.4 GHz Quad-Core Tegra 3, 4.7-inch Screen AT&T Throttling Unlimited Data Users After Only 1-2 GB Iran Claims Its Nuclear Facilities Cannot Be Compromised AMD's 7700 Series Hopes to Conquer Budget End, Suffers From Poor Pricing Rise of the Machines: Mobile Devices to Outnumber Humans by 2016 HP Opens Up Some More webOS Open Source Treasure Chests The RIAA's Dream Turns to Nightmare -- Inside The Pirate Bay's Torrent Purge Automakers Request Changes to Proposed Fuel Efficiency Standards Twitter @RandomMegaBytes yeah so far I haven't heard of any delays @RandomMegaBytes I haven't heard anything of that sort, I've heard reports to the contrary though, asking more OEMs now... @danacowley @kevinmitnick thanks for the tip on thaiphoon, I'll have to try that out :) @kevinmitnick admittedly that's near RTP, there's worse thai in n. raleigh (Lemon Grass) if you have lower standards & don't want to drive @kevinmitnick I haven't tried this place yet but a good friend likes it a lot: http://t.co/SMBHk3R3 @kevinmitnick what kind of food are you looking for? @snakeynag haha I'm a writer, it'd be sort of wrong to not write my own tweets. plus, not nearly baller enough for that to be a thought :) @snakeynag here, pic as proof :-P http://t.co/kSfVAmj4 @snakeynag sorry :-P @snakeynag oh we'll be doing a bunch of them this round, did you check out our enterprise SSD piece? http://t.co/cWfTQ7HL  

Copyright © 1997-2012 AnandTech, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms, Conditions and Privacy Information.
Click Here for Advertising Information Quantcast

No comments:

Post a Comment